Fuck the FBI
I will presume that the FBI has the resources to figure out who I am. Nevertheless, I say this to them. Suck my fucking cock you fascist cunts. Whatever… I’ve got places to flee once this country turns into a redneck dictatorship.
And with that, I give you this article from USA Today.
Librarian's brush with FBI shapes her view of the USA Patriot Act
By Joan AiroldiWed May 18, 6:25 AM ET
It was a moment that librarians had been dreading.
On June 8, 2004, an FBI agent stopped at the Deming branch of the Whatcom County Library System in northwest Washington and requested a list of the people who had borrowed a biography of Osama bin Laden. We said no.
We did not take this step lightly. First, our attorney called the local FBI office and asked why the information was important. She was told that one of our patrons had sent the FBI the book after discovering these words written in the margin: "If the things I'm doing is considered a crime, then let history be a witness that I am a criminal. Hostility toward America is a religious duty and we hope to be rewarded by God."
We told the FBI that it would have to follow legal channels before our board of trustees would address releasing the names of the borrowers. We also informed the FBI that, through a Google search, our attorney had discovered that the words in the margin were almost identical to a statement by bin Laden in a 1998 interview.
Undeterred, the FBI served a subpoena on the library a week later demanding a list of everyone who had borrowed the book since November 2001.
Our trustees faced a difficult decision. It is our job to protect the right of people to obtain the books and other materials they need to form and express ideas. If the government can easily obtain records of the books that our patrons are borrowing, they will not feel free to request the books they want. Who would check out a biography of bin Laden knowing that this might attract the attention of the FBI?
It is for this reason that libraries across the country have taken a strong stand against government intrusion. In the 1980s, it was revealed that the FBI had engaged in a secret "library awareness" program to track the books borrowed by patrons who had emigrated from communist countries. Determined to prevent such activities in the future, librarians helped pass laws in 48 states that bar the surrender of customer information except in compliance with a subpoena.
For our trustees, this sense of responsibility to protect libraries as institutions where people are free to explore any idea ran up against their desire to help their government fight terrorism. But they were resolute and voted unanimously to go to court to quash the FBI subpoena. Fifteen days later, the FBI withdrew its request.
But there is a shadow over our happy ending. Our experience taught us how easily the FBI could have discovered the names of the borrowers, how readily this could happen in any library in the USA. It also drove home for us the dangers that the USA Patriot Act poses to reader privacy.
Since the passage of the Patriot Act in October 2001, the FBI has the power to go to a secret court to request library and bookstore records considered relevant to a national security investigation. It does not have to show that the people whose records are sought are suspected of any crime or explain why they are being investigated. In addition, librarians and booksellers are forbidden to reveal that they have received an order to surrender customer data.
Our government has always possessed the power to obtain library records, but that power has been subject to safeguards. The Patriot Act eliminated those safeguards and made it impossible for people to ask a judge to rule whether the government needs the information it is after. In the current debate over extending or amending the Patriot Act, one of the key questions is whether a library or any other institution can seek an independent review of an order. Even the attorney general conceded in a recent oversight hearing that this is a problem with the law as written.
Fortunately for our patrons, we were able to mount a successful challenge to what seems to have been a fishing expedition. If it had returned with an order from a secret court under the Patriot Act, the FBI might now know which residents in our part of Washington State had simply tried to learn more about bin Laden.
With a Patriot Act order in hand, I would have been forbidden to disclose even the fact that I had received it and would not have been able to tell this story.
Joan Airoldi, a librarian, is director of the library district in Whatcom County, Wash.
And with that, I give you this article from USA Today.
Librarian's brush with FBI shapes her view of the USA Patriot Act
By Joan AiroldiWed May 18, 6:25 AM ET
It was a moment that librarians had been dreading.
On June 8, 2004, an FBI agent stopped at the Deming branch of the Whatcom County Library System in northwest Washington and requested a list of the people who had borrowed a biography of Osama bin Laden. We said no.
We did not take this step lightly. First, our attorney called the local FBI office and asked why the information was important. She was told that one of our patrons had sent the FBI the book after discovering these words written in the margin: "If the things I'm doing is considered a crime, then let history be a witness that I am a criminal. Hostility toward America is a religious duty and we hope to be rewarded by God."
We told the FBI that it would have to follow legal channels before our board of trustees would address releasing the names of the borrowers. We also informed the FBI that, through a Google search, our attorney had discovered that the words in the margin were almost identical to a statement by bin Laden in a 1998 interview.
Undeterred, the FBI served a subpoena on the library a week later demanding a list of everyone who had borrowed the book since November 2001.
Our trustees faced a difficult decision. It is our job to protect the right of people to obtain the books and other materials they need to form and express ideas. If the government can easily obtain records of the books that our patrons are borrowing, they will not feel free to request the books they want. Who would check out a biography of bin Laden knowing that this might attract the attention of the FBI?
It is for this reason that libraries across the country have taken a strong stand against government intrusion. In the 1980s, it was revealed that the FBI had engaged in a secret "library awareness" program to track the books borrowed by patrons who had emigrated from communist countries. Determined to prevent such activities in the future, librarians helped pass laws in 48 states that bar the surrender of customer information except in compliance with a subpoena.
For our trustees, this sense of responsibility to protect libraries as institutions where people are free to explore any idea ran up against their desire to help their government fight terrorism. But they were resolute and voted unanimously to go to court to quash the FBI subpoena. Fifteen days later, the FBI withdrew its request.
But there is a shadow over our happy ending. Our experience taught us how easily the FBI could have discovered the names of the borrowers, how readily this could happen in any library in the USA. It also drove home for us the dangers that the USA Patriot Act poses to reader privacy.
Since the passage of the Patriot Act in October 2001, the FBI has the power to go to a secret court to request library and bookstore records considered relevant to a national security investigation. It does not have to show that the people whose records are sought are suspected of any crime or explain why they are being investigated. In addition, librarians and booksellers are forbidden to reveal that they have received an order to surrender customer data.
Our government has always possessed the power to obtain library records, but that power has been subject to safeguards. The Patriot Act eliminated those safeguards and made it impossible for people to ask a judge to rule whether the government needs the information it is after. In the current debate over extending or amending the Patriot Act, one of the key questions is whether a library or any other institution can seek an independent review of an order. Even the attorney general conceded in a recent oversight hearing that this is a problem with the law as written.
Fortunately for our patrons, we were able to mount a successful challenge to what seems to have been a fishing expedition. If it had returned with an order from a secret court under the Patriot Act, the FBI might now know which residents in our part of Washington State had simply tried to learn more about bin Laden.
With a Patriot Act order in hand, I would have been forbidden to disclose even the fact that I had received it and would not have been able to tell this story.
Joan Airoldi, a librarian, is director of the library district in Whatcom County, Wash.
4 Comments:
Enrico,
I applaud your vigilance and
unwillingness to let the fascist
bureau of intimidation encroach
on your Civil Liberties.
If you would like to see some
very disturbing accounts of criminal activity on behalf of the
FBI, NSA and other Intelligence
(or shall I say counterintelligence agencies) in the USA take a look at my Website
which I have listed below.
Also check out a Website by a former FBI agent who became a whistle blower against Goverment
corruption when he reported that
other agents he knew had committed
perjury in court.
When this agent reported this crime
he was not promoted or rewarded. He was driven out of the FBI and
to this day is psychologically and physically tortured by them while being stalked everyday of his life.
His name is Geral Sosbee and his
Website can be accessed on the Internet by typing in Geral W. Sosbee vs the FBI.
And if the FBI, NSA or Homeland Security tell you to remove my
please do tell them to go FUCK
THEMSELVES!
I do it at least 10 times a day.
Thanks and keep up the good work.
Nice blog you have here.
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/Lyme/page700.html
Since the US Federal Government is now Totalitarian, Americans really need to arm themselves against these fascists.
Better to die defending your Civil Liberties then to live as a cowardish slave under this fascist
regimen, that puppet George Bush
has created for us with the Patriot Act and his phony war on terror.
Who here thinks that Bush and the PNAC were behind 9/11?
Because they were, and all Americans are going to pay for this ostensible war on oil and Civil Rights both in higher taxes and loss of Liberties.
George Bush really is an American
Caligula...
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/Lyme/page700.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/Lyme/page740.html
I don't know if I agree that Bush was behind 9/11. But, I'm not going to suppress his comments.
Enrico, recently the fbi and homeland security deleted my
Website on their harassment of
me and my family, because it discussed their attacks on us in
great detail.
I have created a new Webblog which
contains a much info that you and
your visited can use to protect yourselves from these FUCKING government miscreants.
This is info that most of the mainstream public has no idea about. Some of it classified which just happened to fall into the right hands. I admire you and your Website for your Patriotic
views and dislike of the repressive establishment that we
have in this country which should
be called AmeriKKKA which is run
by AmeriNAZI's.
Anyway, here's the site and keep up the good work!
Jim Marino
http://9-11themotherofallblackopertions.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment
<< Home